1966 Alfa Romeo GT vs. 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alfa Romeo GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alfa Romeo GT would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma (168 HP) has 75 more horse power than 1966 Alfa Romeo GT. (93 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 1966 Alfa Romeo GT.
Because 1966 Alfa Romeo GT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alfa Romeo GT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alfa Romeo GT | 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mitsubishi |
Model | GT | Sigma |
Year Released | 1966 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1290 cc | 2972 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 168 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |