1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo vs. 1950 Simca 8
To start off, 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Simca 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Simca 8 would be higher. At 1,570 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo (114 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1950 Simca 8. (33 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo should accelerate faster than 1950 Simca 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Simca 8 weights approximately 220 kg more than 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo | 1950 Simca 8 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Simca |
Model | Scarabeo | 8 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1570 cc | 1090 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1030 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2430 mm |