1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo vs. 1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo | 1953 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Scarabeo | Phantom |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 3690 mm |
