1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo vs. 1967 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1967 Ford Mustang is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo would be higher. At 4,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford Mustang (217 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. (114 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Ford Mustang weights approximately 465 kg more than 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo | 1967 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
| Model | Scarabeo | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1570 cc | 4733 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 1165 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1030 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2750 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 68 L |
