1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo vs. 1969 BMW 2000
To start off, 1969 BMW 2000 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 BMW 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 BMW 2000 weights approximately 400 kg more than 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo | 1969 BMW 2000 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | BMW |
Model | Scarabeo | 2000 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1570 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1030 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 70 L |