1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo vs. 1977 Mazda 929
To start off, 1977 Mazda 929 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1977 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo (114 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1977 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo should accelerate faster than 1977 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Mazda 929 weights approximately 374 kg more than 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo (144 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Mazda 929. (134 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo | 1977 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
Model | Scarabeo | 929 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1570 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 134 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 88 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 1074 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1030 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 55 L |