1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo vs. 1978 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1978 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1250 kg more than 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo | 1978 Cadillac Brougham | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | Scarabeo | Brougham |
Year Released | 1966 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1570 cc | 5032 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 1950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 5630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 3090 mm |