1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo vs. 1980 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1980 Toyota Celica is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1980 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Toyota Celica (118 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. (114 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Toyota Celica weights approximately 482 kg more than 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Toyota Celica (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. (144 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1980 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo | 1980 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Toyota |
Model | Scarabeo | Celica |
Year Released | 1966 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1570 cc | 2563 cc |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 1182 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1030 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2640 mm |