1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo vs. 1982 Dodge Omni
To start off, 1982 Dodge Omni is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo would be higher. At 1,716 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Dodge Omni is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Dodge Omni weights approximately 295 kg more than 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo.
Because 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Dodge Omni, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo | 1982 Dodge Omni | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Dodge |
| Model | Scarabeo | Omni |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1570 cc | 1716 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 200 km/hour | 146 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 995 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1030 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2530 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 49 L |
