1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo vs. 1984 Chrysler Le Baron
To start off, 1984 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Chrysler Le Baron weights approximately 500 kg more than 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo.
Because 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo | 1984 Chrysler Le Baron | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chrysler |
Model | Scarabeo | Le Baron |
Year Released | 1966 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1570 cc | 2212 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1030 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 53 L |