1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo vs. 1986 Citroen Aventure
To start off, 1986 Citroen Aventure is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Citroen Aventure is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo (114 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1986 Citroen Aventure. (59 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo should accelerate faster than 1986 Citroen Aventure.
Because 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Citroen Aventure, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo (144 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Citroen Aventure. (120 Nm). This means 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Citroen Aventure.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo | 1986 Citroen Aventure | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Citroen |
Model | Scarabeo | Aventure |
Year Released | 1966 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1570 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 120 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |