1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo vs. 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ
To start off, 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo would be higher. At 2,958 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ weights approximately 680 kg more than 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ (244 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. (144 Nm). This means 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo | 1989 Alfa Romeo RZ | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | Scarabeo | RZ |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1570 cc | 2958 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 144 Nm | 244 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 72.9 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Top Speed | 200 km/hour | 233 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 1380 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2520 mm |
