1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo vs. 1989 Buick Skyhawk
To start off, 1989 Buick Skyhawk is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo (114 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1989 Buick Skyhawk. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo should accelerate faster than 1989 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Buick Skyhawk weights approximately 380 kg more than 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo.
Because 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo | 1989 Buick Skyhawk | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Buick |
Model | Scarabeo | Skyhawk |
Year Released | 1966 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1570 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2580 mm |