1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo vs. 1991 Opel Kadett
To start off, 1991 Opel Kadett is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo would be higher. At 1,570 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Opel Kadett, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo | 1991 Opel Kadett | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Opel |
Model | Scarabeo | Kadett |
Year Released | 1966 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1570 cc | 1194 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1030 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2530 mm |