1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo vs. 1994 Mazda MX-3
To start off, 1994 Mazda MX-3 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Mazda MX-3 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Mazda MX-3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo | 1994 Mazda MX-3 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
Model | Scarabeo | MX-3 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1570 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1030 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2460 mm |