1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo vs. 1994 Vauxhall Tigra

To start off, 1994 Vauxhall Tigra is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo would be higher. At 1,570 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo (114 HP) has 25 more horse power than 1994 Vauxhall Tigra. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo should accelerate faster than 1994 Vauxhall Tigra.

Because 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Vauxhall Tigra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo (144 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Vauxhall Tigra. (125 Nm). This means 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Vauxhall Tigra. 1994 Vauxhall Tigra has automatic transmission and 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo has manual transmission. 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1994 Vauxhall Tigra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: