1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo vs. 2000 Ford ST 460
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 346 more horse power than 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. (114 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford ST 460 (178 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. (144 Nm). This means 2000 Ford ST 460 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo | 2000 Ford ST 460 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | Scarabeo | ST 460 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1570 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 460 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 178 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2580 mm |