1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo vs. 2001 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2001 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Citroen C-Crosser has automatic transmission and 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo has manual transmission. 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Citroen C-Crosser will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo | 2001 Citroen C-Crosser | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Citroen |
| Model | Scarabeo | C-Crosser |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1570 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4290 mm |
