1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo vs. 2001 Volvo SCC
To start off, 2001 Volvo SCC is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo would be higher. At 2,521 cc, 2001 Volvo SCC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Volvo SCC (208 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. (114 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Volvo SCC should accelerate faster than 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Volvo SCC weights approximately 751 kg more than 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Volvo SCC (285 Nm) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. (144 Nm). This means 2001 Volvo SCC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. 2001 Volvo SCC has automatic transmission and 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo has manual transmission. 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Volvo SCC will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo | 2001 Volvo SCC | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Volvo |
| Model | Scarabeo | SCC |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1570 cc | 2521 cc |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 144 Nm | 285 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 1451 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2720 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 70 L |
