1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo vs. 2002 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2002 Mitsubishi Minica is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo would be higher. At 1,570 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mitsubishi Minica weights approximately 10 kg more than 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo.
Because 2002 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo | 2002 Mitsubishi Minica | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mitsubishi |
Model | Scarabeo | Minica |
Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1570 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1030 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2350 mm |