1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo vs. 2004 Ford E-350
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. (114 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1788 kg more than 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 331 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. (144 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo | 2004 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | Scarabeo | E-350 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1570 cc | 5408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 475 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 90.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 106 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 2488 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 5900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1030 mm | 2140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 132 L |