1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo vs. 2004 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2004 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo would be higher. At 1,570 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 470 kg more than 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo.
Because 2004 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Nissan Bluebird has automatic transmission and 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo has manual transmission. 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Nissan Bluebird will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo | 2004 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Nissan |
| Model | Scarabeo | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1570 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1030 mm | 1450 mm |
