1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 246 more horse power than 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. (114 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo. (144 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alfa Romeo Scarabeo | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Holden |
Model | Scarabeo | Commodore |
Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1570 cc | 5976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 360 HP |
Torque | 144 Nm | 290 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |