1966 Alpine A 110 vs. 1952 Austin A 70
To start off, 1966 Alpine A 110 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin A 70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Alpine A 110 (95 HP) has 32 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 70. (63 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Alpine A 110 should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A 70 weights approximately 725 kg more than 1966 Alpine A 110.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alpine A 110 | 1952 Austin A 70 | |
| Make | Alpine | Austin |
| Model | A 110 | A 70 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1108 cc | 2200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 63 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 79.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 111.1 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 545 kg | 1270 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2440 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 63 L |
