1966 Alpine A 110 vs. 1962 Humber Hawk
To start off, 1966 Alpine A 110 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Humber Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Humber Hawk would be higher. At 2,265 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Humber Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Alpine A 110 (95 HP) has 22 more horse power than 1962 Humber Hawk. (73 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Alpine A 110 should accelerate faster than 1962 Humber Hawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Humber Hawk weights approximately 890 kg more than 1966 Alpine A 110.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alpine A 110 | 1962 Humber Hawk | |
| Make | Alpine | Humber |
| Model | A 110 | Hawk |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1108 cc | 2265 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 73 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 81 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 110 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.4:1 | 7.5:1 |
| Top Speed | 193 km/hour | 130 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 545 kg | 1435 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2800 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 72 L |
