1966 Alpine A 110 vs. 1963 Cadillac Biarritz
To start off, 1966 Alpine A 110 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac Biarritz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac Biarritz would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac Biarritz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac Biarritz (197 HP) has 102 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A 110. (95 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac Biarritz should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac Biarritz weights approximately 1635 kg more than 1966 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alpine A 110 | 1963 Cadillac Biarritz | |
| Make | Alpine | Cadillac |
| Model | A 110 | Biarritz |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1963 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1108 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 101.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 98.4 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 545 kg | 2180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 75 L |
