1966 Alpine A 110 vs. 1964 Holden EH
To start off, 1966 Alpine A 110 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,928 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Holden EH (100 HP) has 5 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A 110. (95 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Holden EH should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Holden EH weights approximately 570 kg more than 1966 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alpine A 110 | 1964 Holden EH | |
| Make | Alpine | Holden |
| Model | A 110 | EH |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1108 cc | 2928 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 100 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 545 kg | 1115 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2670 mm |
