1966 Alpine A 110 vs. 1965 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 1966 Alpine A 110 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Lincoln Continental (284 HP) has 189 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A 110. (95 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 1861 kg more than 1966 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alpine A 110 | 1965 Lincoln Continental | |
| Make | Alpine | Lincoln |
| Model | A 110 | Continental |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1108 cc | 7048 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 284 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 545 kg | 2406 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 2000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 3210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 90 L |
