1966 Alpine A 110 vs. 1968 Riley 4
To start off, 1968 Riley 4 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 1,622 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Riley 4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Alpine A 110 (95 HP) has 28 more horse power than 1968 Riley 4. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Alpine A 110 should accelerate faster than 1968 Riley 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Riley 4 weights approximately 603 kg more than 1966 Alpine A 110.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alpine A 110 | 1968 Riley 4 | |
Make | Alpine | Riley |
Model | A 110 | 4 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1968 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1108 cc | 1622 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 67 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 76.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.4:1 | 8.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 545 kg | 1148 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 45 L |