1966 Alpine A 110 vs. 1972 Austin 2200
To start off, 1972 Austin 2200 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 2,227 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Austin 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Austin 2200 (110 HP) has 15 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A 110. (95 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Austin 2200 should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Austin 2200 weights approximately 636 kg more than 1966 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alpine A 110 | 1972 Austin 2200 | |
Make | Alpine | Austin |
Model | A 110 | 2200 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1108 cc | 2227 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 110 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 76.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 81.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.4:1 | 9.0:1 |
Top Speed | 193 km/hour | 163 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 545 kg | 1181 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 56 L |