1966 Alpine A 110 vs. 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne
To start off, 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne (110 HP) has 15 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A 110. (95 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A 110.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alpine A 110 | 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne | |
Make | Alpine | Chevrolet |
Model | A 110 | Biscayne |
Year Released | 1966 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1108 cc | 4097 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 110 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.4:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 3090 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 87 L |