1966 Alpine A 110 vs. 1974 Cadillac Eldorado
To start off, 1974 Cadillac Eldorado is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 8,191 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Cadillac Eldorado (198 HP) has 103 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A 110. (95 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 1730 kg more than 1966 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Alpine A 110 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alpine A 110. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Cadillac Eldorado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alpine A 110 | 1974 Cadillac Eldorado | |
| Make | Alpine | Cadillac |
| Model | A 110 | Eldorado |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1974 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1108 cc | 8191 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 198 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 545 kg | 2275 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 2030 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 3220 mm |
