1966 Alpine A 110 vs. 1983 Seat Ronda
To start off, 1983 Seat Ronda is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 1,193 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Seat Ronda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Alpine A 110 (95 HP) has 33 more horse power than 1983 Seat Ronda. (62 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Alpine A 110 should accelerate faster than 1983 Seat Ronda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Seat Ronda weights approximately 355 kg more than 1966 Alpine A 110.
Because 1966 Alpine A 110 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alpine A 110. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Seat Ronda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alpine A 110 | 1983 Seat Ronda | |
| Make | Alpine | Seat |
| Model | A 110 | Ronda |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1983 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1108 cc | 1193 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 67.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.4:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 545 kg | 900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4020 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2460 mm |
