1966 Alpine A 110 vs. 1990 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1990 Lotus Elan is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Lotus Elan (163 HP) has 68 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A 110. (95 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Lotus Elan weights approximately 475 kg more than 1966 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Alpine A 110 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alpine A 110. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Lotus Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alpine A 110 | 1990 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Alpine | Lotus |
Model | A 110 | Elan |
Year Released | 1966 | 1990 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1108 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 163 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 545 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2260 mm |