1966 Alpine A 110 vs. 1990 Renault Clio
To start off, 1990 Renault Clio is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 1,870 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Alpine A 110 (95 HP) has 33 more horse power than 1990 Renault Clio. (62 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Alpine A 110 should accelerate faster than 1990 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Renault Clio weights approximately 360 kg more than 1966 Alpine A 110.
Because 1966 Alpine A 110 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alpine A 110. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alpine A 110 | 1990 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Alpine | Renault |
| Model | A 110 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1990 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Size | 1108 cc | 1870 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.4:1 | 23.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 545 kg | 905 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1400 mm |
