1966 Alpine A 110 vs. 1994 Chrysler ES
To start off, 1994 Chrysler ES is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Alpine A 110 (95 HP) has 2 more horse power than 1994 Chrysler ES. (93 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Alpine A 110 should accelerate faster than 1994 Chrysler ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Chrysler ES weights approximately 600 kg more than 1966 Alpine A 110.
Because 1966 Alpine A 110 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alpine A 110. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alpine A 110 | 1994 Chrysler ES | |
| Make | Alpine | Chrysler |
| Model | A 110 | ES |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1108 cc | 2213 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 87.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.4:1 | 8.1:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 545 kg | 1145 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2470 mm |
