1966 Alpine A 110 vs. 1995 BMW CLS
To start off, 1995 BMW CLS is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 BMW CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP) has 255 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A 110. (95 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A 110.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alpine A 110 | 1995 BMW CLS | |
Make | Alpine | BMW |
Model | A 110 | CLS |
Year Released | 1966 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1108 cc | 3001 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 350 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1360 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2710 mm |