1966 Alpine A 110 vs. 1996 Mercury Villager
To start off, 1996 Mercury Villager is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 2,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mercury Villager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercury Villager (149 HP) has 54 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A 110. (95 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercury Villager should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercury Villager weights approximately 1255 kg more than 1966 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Alpine A 110 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alpine A 110. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mercury Villager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alpine A 110 | 1996 Mercury Villager | |
| Make | Alpine | Mercury |
| Model | A 110 | Villager |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1108 cc | 2960 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 149 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 545 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2860 mm |
