1966 Alpine A 110 vs. 1998 Mazda Midge
To start off, 1998 Mazda Midge is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 1,323 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Mazda Midge is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mazda Midge (67 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A 110. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mazda Midge should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mazda Midge weights approximately 390 kg more than 1966 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Alpine A 110 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alpine A 110. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Mazda Midge, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alpine A 110 | 1998 Mazda Midge | |
Make | Alpine | Mazda |
Model | A 110 | Midge |
Year Released | 1966 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 956 cc | 1323 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 576 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1400 mm |