1966 Alpine A 110 vs. 1999 Daihatsu Micros 3l
To start off, 1999 Daihatsu Micros 3l is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 1,108 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Alpine A 110 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Alpine A 110 (95 HP) has 7 more horse power than 1999 Daihatsu Micros 3l. (88 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Alpine A 110 should accelerate faster than 1999 Daihatsu Micros 3l. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Daihatsu Micros 3l weights approximately 25 kg more than 1966 Alpine A 110.
Because 1966 Alpine A 110 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alpine A 110. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Daihatsu Micros 3l, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alpine A 110 | 1999 Daihatsu Micros 3l | |
| Make | Alpine | Daihatsu |
| Model | A 110 | Micros 3l |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1108 cc | 659 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 88 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 545 kg | 570 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 1570 mm |
