1966 Alpine A 110 vs. 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv
To start off, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv (276 HP) has 181 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A 110. (95 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv weights approximately 705 kg more than 1966 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv has automatic transmission and 1966 Alpine A 110 has manual transmission. 1966 Alpine A 110 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alpine A 110 | 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv | |
Make | Alpine | Mazda |
Model | A 110 | RX-Evolv |
Year Released | 1966 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1108 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 276 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 545 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1360 mm |