1966 Alpine A 110 vs. 2000 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2000 Toyota Celica is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Alpine A 110 (95 HP) has 21 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Celica. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Alpine A 110 should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Celica weights approximately 1065 kg more than 1966 Alpine A 110.
Because 2000 Toyota Celica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Alpine A 110. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alpine A 110 | 2000 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Alpine | Toyota |
Model | A 110 | Celica |
Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1108 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 74 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.4:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 545 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 87 L |