1966 Alpine A 110 vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 1,108 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Alpine A 110 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Alpine A 110 (95 HP) has 1 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ecosport. (94 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Alpine A 110 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1966 Alpine A 110 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alpine A 110. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alpine A 110 | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Alpine | Ford |
Model | A 110 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1966 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1108 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 94 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2490 mm |