1966 Alpine A 110 vs. 2003 Mazda 2
To start off, 2003 Mazda 2 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 1,241 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Alpine A 110 (95 HP) has 21 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 2. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Alpine A 110 should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 2 weights approximately 505 kg more than 1966 Alpine A 110.
Because 1966 Alpine A 110 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alpine A 110. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alpine A 110 | 2003 Mazda 2 | |
| Make | Alpine | Mazda |
| Model | A 110 | 2 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1108 cc | 1241 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 71.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 76.5 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 545 kg | 1050 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2500 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 45 L |
