1966 Alpine A 110 vs. 2003 MG TF
To start off, 2003 MG TF is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 MG TF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MG TF (115 HP) has 20 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A 110. (95 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 MG TF should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MG TF weights approximately 555 kg more than 1966 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alpine A 110 | 2003 MG TF | |
Make | Alpine | MG |
Model | A 110 | TF |
Year Released | 1966 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
Engine Position | Rear | Middle |
Engine Size | 1108 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 115 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.4:1 | 10.5:1 |
Top Speed | 193 km/hour | 190 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 545 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 50 L |