1966 Alpine A 110 vs. 2004 Cadillac XLR
To start off, 2004 Cadillac XLR is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 4,572 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac XLR (320 HP) has 225 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A 110. (95 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac XLR weights approximately 1095 kg more than 1966 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alpine A 110 | 2004 Cadillac XLR | |
Make | Alpine | Cadillac |
Model | A 110 | XLR |
Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1108 cc | 4572 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 320 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 84 mm |
Top Speed | 193 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 545 kg | 1640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 64 L |