1966 Alpine A 110 vs. 2004 Ford GT
To start off, 2004 Ford GT is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 5,409 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford GT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford GT (494 HP) has 399 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A 110. (95 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford GT should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford GT weights approximately 975 kg more than 1966 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alpine A 110 | 2004 Ford GT | |
Make | Alpine | Ford |
Model | A 110 | GT |
Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1108 cc | 5409 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 494 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 90.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 105.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.4:1 | 8.4:1 |
Top Speed | 193 km/hour | 305 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 545 kg | 1520 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1130 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 66 L |