1966 Alpine A 110 vs. 2004 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A 110. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Ranger weights approximately 632 kg more than 1966 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Alpine A 110. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Alpine A 110 | 2004 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Alpine | Ford |
| Model | A 110 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 956 cc | 4015 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 207 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 576 kg | 1208 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 3200 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 74 L |
