1966 Alpine A 110 vs. 2005 Dodge Durango
To start off, 2005 Dodge Durango is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Durango is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Durango (210 HP) has 115 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A 110. (95 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Durango should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Durango weights approximately 1593 kg more than 1966 Alpine A 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alpine A 110 | 2005 Dodge Durango | |
Make | Alpine | Dodge |
Model | A 110 | Durango |
Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1108 cc | 3704 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 210 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.4:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 545 kg | 2138 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 102 L |