1966 Alpine A 110 vs. 2005 Mazda 2
To start off, 2005 Mazda 2 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 1,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Alpine A 110 (95 HP) has 28 more horse power than 2005 Mazda 2. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Alpine A 110 should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda 2 weights approximately 1240 kg more than 1966 Alpine A 110.
Because 1966 Alpine A 110 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alpine A 110. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Alpine A 110 | 2005 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Alpine | Mazda |
Model | A 110 | 2 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1108 cc | 1399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 67 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 73.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.4:1 | 18.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 545 kg | 1785 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 45 L |